Top Tens #3-Worst Four-Star Heroes

Okay, here it is!

#10A-Paris
His skill could potentially be really good, except heroes can walk out of the trap he creates. If the trap bound heroes into it, Paris would probably improve off this list.

#10B-Pettyfer
Better than Ragnar, although not by much... hero states don't matter much unless the hero can do LOTS of damage with AOE, and that's clearly not what Pettyfer has.

#9-Ragnar
Worse than Pettyfer because you actually have to kill enemy heroes. I think many three-stars are even better than Ragnar.

#8-Helmar
A weaker Reinhard that does better than Urza, because when Urza resurrects most enemies will already be attacking your backline.

#7-Bellerophon
He was never that good, mostly because he is a mounted archer. Initially everyone thought he was a cavalry unit, and that got everyone excited because that might actually have been good. But no, all he has are really bad mounted archer units. He isn't too bad because you could use him to destroy enemy healing or snipe heroes but there are better choices for both of these uses.

#6-Urza
Worst four-star pikeman. You could use as a substitute for Reinhard, but Helmar would be better.

#5-Hilda
She was initially pretty good as she could resurrect, then Triniti rekt her with a major skill debuff. They rebuffed her, but her skill is still not good.

#4-Hedvig
Very average. Increasing the cooldown might be ok on heroes like Reinhard, but overall Morgana is much better.

#3-Anatole
Restoring stats (which is a very low amount of every ally hero that has died) is bad enough since the stat amount is really low... but what makes it worse is that he is an archer with already low stats... plus those stats won't do much...

#2-William Tell
As far as I know, he is almost useless as his skill does not protect heroes from GDR reflection. Hero tanks are the only way to use him effectively, because typically AOE doesn't damage heroes too badly.

#1-Charles Martel
He was bad, and then Triniti nerfed him. R.I.P. CM